Hah I wish I could! I've only done it a handful of times myself, but enough times to realize that if it looks like there'll be more of it in my future, I'll either hire it out or get someone to show me a faster workflow. And Reaper is almost a meta-tool that you can optimize yourself, if you take the time to do it. It's just a matter of community and workflow/UX - different tools are optimized for different things and entrenched with different users. (See also in this space, Bitwig and FL Studio.)Īt the end of the day, all modern DAWs can do all the same common/core tasks.
REAPER SOFTWARE MUSIC FOR FREE
If that's your bag then definitely give it a go (the full version is expensive but you can get Ableton Lite for free or close to it via special offers and hardware bonuses), but if you're working with more sequential music then a traditional DAW is probably more natural. It's well worth trying if you have a Mac, comes with lots of virtual instruments that are arguably worth the price alone - but it is opinionated about AU format whereas Reaper is nice and compatible with other things, programmable, etc.Ībleton is a different and interesting beast, a DAW but also oriented towards live performance, electro-DJ-loop stuff, etc. Logic Pro is actually pretty darn affordable as DAWs go ($199, which is more than base Reaper but actually less than Reaper commercial license), and it's essentially an upsell of Garage Band and almost a loss leader for Apple to keep a "creative" tinge (except I'm sure they make money on it, just less than they could if they pushed it - it was more expensive before Apple bought it). You didn't mention it, but Pro Tools is the dominant (and truly pricey) DAW in professional studios, and so a big reason for using it is if you want to work with those folks and share projects back and forth. As with much expensive software, the biggest difference isn't what it does but who uses it.
0 kommentar(er)
